" /> Stone Cold Pimpin': December 2005 Archives

« November 2005 | Main | January 2006 »

December 29, 2005

So, what does this chart mean, eh?

recordsales.gif
Okay, so you see this chart of album sales? So where's all the money that mp3s and fille sharing have taken from the record industry? Surely, 1996, before the explosion of the Internet and file sharing, should be higher than now, correct?
Unless, of course, the record industry has just been MAKING SHIT UP.

December 27, 2005

Motel Hell

Wahweap-Lodge,-Page-Arizona.jpg
Keith Milford's Motel Hell is a blog that collects postcards of American motels and reststops. If you loved Phaidon's Boring Postcards books (and who doesn't?) you'll love the damp, moldy smell of this site.

December 24, 2005

The Way of Sushi

sushiya.jpg
Please don't make fun of the Japanese: they do a much better job when they make fun of themselves. Here's an odd little mockumentary about how to enjoy sushi.
By way of Joi Ito's blog.

December 22, 2005

If you're havin' girl problems I feel bad for you, son

"I've got 34 Scandals but a bitch ain't one!

Hit me!

Oh, and by the way, you're doin' a heckuva job, Brownie. And Rummy. And Cheney.

Also, over at Daily Kos, they are trying to figure out Chimpy's Top 10 Worst Days of 2005.

Was it playing guitar while New Orleans drowned? Was it Cindy Sheehan camping out? Was it Sweet Murtha of God? Was it Libby indicted?

So much to choose from!

December 20, 2005

Some recent blogroll entries + more!!

You may have noticed a few additions to the blog these days. One is the funky list of what I supposedly have at home from Netflix (left hand column). However, it's experiencing some difficulty and telling you some of what I sent back. Don't blame me, blame Netflix's RSS feed.
The other addition is my del.icio.us links on the right hand side, above the BlogRoll. Both of these feeds were made possible by FeedDigest, which I urge you to check out.
So anyway, I just wanted to alert you to some cool sites I've added to the blogroll, as they're worth checking out:
Cute Overload: A blog of nothing but cute animals. Woogiewoogiewoogie, aren't you the cutest???
Same Hat! Same Hat!: a blog about translating experimental Japanese manga and American manga-style artists.
Subject Barred: Linked from K-punk, Irish follower of Zizek and cultural critic. Has yet to really get going, but K-punk vouches for this site.
Twitch Film: Latest news and trailers about all cool films that are not Hollywood poo.

December 16, 2005

Win a Free MacMini!! (or not)

Do those ads offering free MacMinis/iPods/iBooks really work? Is it all just a big scam? Well, yes and no.
Hardy Menagh from LowEndMac.com dives in and tries to surface with a free mini.

Yes, You Can Get a 'Free' Mac mini - but Is It Worth the Hassles?

Subtracting the cost of the failed DVD order and adding the music CDs, my total outlay, excluding credit card purchases, was $70. I used the credit cards to purchase items I would have bought anyway. If you want to, you can add $60 to the total for these items.

A Mac mini with the features this one has retails for $499 shipped from The Apple Store. If you can be happy with these features, it's definitely worth the cost.

December 12, 2005

Tomb of the Cybermen

dr_who_cybermen_tomb.jpg
Dir. Morris Barry
1966
Tomb of the Cybermen is exactly the kind of DVD to pull out when you still have a cold a week later,
and can't be arsed to do anything else.
One of the few surviving Patrick Troughton-era Doctor Who serials (most of which were thrown out by the BBC to make room on their tape shelves) and one of two available on DVD, this was thought lost until discovered in a Hong Kong basement in 1992. Proclaimed a "classic" by now-grown-up impressionable children who hadn't seen it since, this four-part story fortunately is a cute dose of early Who.

In fact, the story is a bit like Alien/s, and the TARDIS crew meet up with an archeological dig on the planet of Telos, who have come to unearth the tomb of the title. The archy-crew contain nowt but stereotypes: deceitful Krauts, wishy-washy Limeys, gung-ho Yanks (although sensible in that one always avoids action and stays outside to fix the spacecraft), and a large black slave chap called Toberman. Good name that. Well, he's not actually a slave, but the evil German lady's bodyguard who speaks very little English, all strong and quasi-savage like. Who says the future is progressive?
So, with the help of the Doctor, who keeps aiding them in going further towards danger, then telling them off when someone gets killed, they enter the tomb. The deceitful Germans manage to rouse the Cybermen from deep sleep (in an impressive-for-the-time cyrogenic chamber set into the wall), then foolishly try to bargain with them. However, the Cybermen and their main controller-leader will have none of that, and set about capturing humans and turning them into half-cyber hybrids to continue the race. The Cybermen, by the way, talk like Mark E. Smith through a kazoo. "We are cyberman-ah! We will survive-ah!" Good stuff. And the lead controller Cyberman has a pointy brain-dome thing to show you he's the main guy.
Companions Jamie (Scottish bloke, always ready for a tussle, but rarely tussles here) and Victoria (very hot, but a bit of a plank) perform their usual duties (getting in the way, screaming, running around). The Doctor, as I said, steps in at the last moment to fix everything, but for a lot of this story, he lets the humans get on with it and screw it all up.
I don't know if I really find the Cybermen that interesting a Doctor Who villain. The Daleks were already set up as inhuman, metallic things, so the Cyberman have little else to make them stand out, except for the blank face and the silver outfit. For a lot of Tomb they wander about, doing very little exterminating. "Kill the humanoid-ah!" Go on! What, no? They don't like humans, but they seem reluctant to kill any off. I look forward to next year's new season of Doctor Who to see how Russell Davis reimagines these guys. Hopefully it'll make sense.

December 10, 2005

How Long Will It Take to Fix My Camera?

a70-frontleft.jpg
On Saturday, December 3, my bleedin' PowerShot A70 broke. Though I could still view old images, the viewfinder in camera mode showed a blur of black and violet. Balls! This will be a regularly updated entry to see how long Canon takes to fix this problem.


UPDATE! 1/3

FedEx note on my door sez they tried to deliver a package, but maybe this is something else I ordered (shoes). The exciting answer tomorrow!!!


UPDATE! 12/29

A little email (followed by a letter the same day) informs me that the camera has been fixed and shipped. So I will have to borrow a camera to get that New Year's Eve action. Balls.


UPDATE! 12/21

Canon loves me! They really love me! They've officially decided to fix my camera FOC (free of charge). Niiiiice. "You will receive the camera within 7 working days of this date." I put that date at 12/30, just in time to catch a photo of me sicking up too much vodka for New Year's. Excellent.
But we'll see, won't we?

UPDATE! 12/19
UPS delivered the package to Elks Grove, IL this morning. Get to work, dudes.

UPDATE! 12/13
Returned home yesterday to find the letter from Canon containing my UPS sticker. I sent out the camera in the box today. Let the thumb twiddling begin!

December 4
Took the camera down to Russ Camera, just to see if this was a commonly diagnosed problem. It was.
"It's the chip!" the lady there said. "Are you out of warranty?"
Yes, I am!
"Did you buy it with a credit card?"
Yes, I did!
"Ah, well, some credit card companies actually extend any warranty for you. You should give them a call."

December 5
I give my VISA card a call and find out that yes, there is an extra year tacked on to all orders paid. Cool.

December 7
At work, I call Canon and I don't even have to worry about warranties. Because this sounds exactly like a bad chip, and the A70 was known (was it?) for bad chips, they will fix it for free. But they need the camera's serial number.

I rush home after class and in the final five minutes before their customer support goes home for the day, I relay the serial and I'm told that they will send out a packing label for me. Upon receipt, it should take 7 - 10 working days. I imagine a backed up tech lab with piles of faulty A70s. A harried chip-replacer says to himself "Goddamnit! I must be seven to ten days behind. And it only takes a minute to replace!"

December 10
Still no packing slip in mail...hmm...

December 09, 2005

Two Uneasy Pieces

Unlikable: Two Road Movies
sideways.jpg
Sideways
Dir. Alexander Payne
2004

Five Easy Pieces
Dir. Bob Rafaelson
1970

This week, while suffering from post-movie-premiere exhaustion, I finally got back to watching films. I have a stack of DVDs waiting and I'm set to tackle them.
And maybe subconsciously, I chose two men-on-the-road movies, "Sideways" and "Five Easy Pieces." Twenty-four years separate these films, but there are many similarities, and I'll comment on a few here.
Briefly, Sideways, for those who haven't seen it, concerns two mid-life crises men on a week-long road trip to Santa Barbara's wine country. The two--Paul Giamatti and Michael Haden Church--were roommates in college, and now Church's Jack is about to marry--into money, we see, which would solve at least temporarily his failing acting career. Giamatti's is an alcoholic wine connoisseur, a failed writer, with a failed marriage, and the inability to move forward. Over the week they both meet a woman each, and slowly Giamatti's Miles grows up a little.
Five Easy Pieces stars Jack Nicholson as Robert, who we first meet working on an oil field in Wasco, CA. We might mistake Wasco for Waco, Texas, for all the oil and dust, but then again, we might mistake Nicholson's Robert as just another minimum wage cracker until it's revealed he's the lone wolf son of a musical patriarchy. And when that patriarch has two strokes and is near death, Robert is called back up to the family's retreat off the coast of Washington state.
Both Robert and Miles are in existential crisis, lost, unsure who they are, who they could be, and if anything lies ahead. So they take to the road, Robert on a trip towards the father, and Miles towards (metaphorically) the wife, as if to discover what went wrong.

Giamatti meets up with Maya, a waitress at one of the restaurants he liked to eat at when wine touring in the past. He's known her for some time, but in the past both were married. Not anymore. Now both are divorced, wounded, and unsure whether to open up again. In fact, it is only on Jack''s insistence that Miles even winds up on a dinner date with her, which he nearly sabotages by drinking too much and calling his ex from a payphone.
For the first half of Sideways, we side with Church's character, who sees the week as the chance for one last fling, and who vows to get the depressive Miles laid. In fact, Sideways is the "bachelor party" post-teen comedy, just made twenty years too late. I wouldn't say that both men should know better, as Miles's too sensible behavior would only lead him to solitary rounds of golf and destructive wine quaffing.
Then in a very well-written scene, Robert and Maya sit on the porch of her friend's house and describe their love for pinot noir. The reasons and descriptions differ, but both are essentially describing themselves. Maya falls in love with Miles right there. Again, Miles blows his chance, and makes and excuse to wash his face. Love will hurt, he knows, and he chooses to avoid it. From this moment on, we side with Miles and it's Jack that becomes the deluded one. He's hooked up with a young mother--Sandra Oh's Stephanie--and believes that's he's fallen in love when he's only actually fallen in bed. His declarations of love will wind up hurting Stephanie, and Jack's fate is the one that Miles is precisely trying to avoid.
Yet, he still ends up hurting Maya, and returns from the week defeated. It's only when he meets his ex, now happily married, off the sauce, and, most tellingly, pregnant, that he wises up, grows a little. His karmic reward is a call, some time later, from Maya. Director Alexander Payne wisely stops short of showing us that second meeting, as its the journey, not the end that's important.
Miles is not exactly a likable character, mostly due to his self-sabotage and self pity. And his personal growth is minimal but still meaningful.
And in fact, several of my friends have not liked Sideways because the character is so unlikable. I find this strange, as Sideways does not present an unlikable character as if we should approve of his antics (not in the way, for example, an Adam Sandler comedy presents awful social behavior and expects it to be rewarded).
five_easy_pieces_restaurant.jpg
If they want unlikable, take a look at Nicholson's Robert. He has no time for his supportive yet annoying waitress girlfriend Rayette (Karen Black). His response when he hears that she's pregnant is to shag another chick and leave town. Played by anyone else, Robert would be quite repugnant. Nicholson's charisma and the sense that he's attacking society (residue from Easy Rider's ideology) when he's attacking women and working class world he's slumming in smoothes over a lot of the more negative aspects.
What is interesting about Rafaelson's film, especially now, is the gradual unveiling of character. We assume Robert is from Wasco, but only when he travels to Los Angeles to meet his pianist sister (at a emotionally fraught recording session) do we get a sense of his real past. And only when he arrives in Washington and sits down to dinner do we understand that he too was a prodigy, just that something went wrong along the way (we get a hint that it was too much pressure from the father to measure up). I can't imagine a Hollywood film of today keeping so much information withheld from the audience.
He agrees to take Rayette along with him on the journey up north. Along the way they pick up two hitchhikers, a (lesbian?) couple, one of which has a great running monologue about all the "crap" in society she is escaping by traveling to Alaska. It's in this section of the film, a narrative bridge of sorts, where Nicholson performs the infamous "I want you to hold it between your knees" diner scene. Again, he's rebelling against society, but its an empty gesture. He wins the hitchhiker's admiration, but not long after he dumps the two by the side of the highway. He then leaves Rayette at a motel so he can travel to the family compound alone, embarrassed by her class.
Yet neither does he fit in at the father's house. The sister has a strange attraction to the father's male nurse. The brother, with a twisted neck and phony British accent, seems less a sibling and more a stage actor. The brother's protege and lover, Catherine, starts making eyes at Robert, or does he imagine it? Either way, he tries to seduce her, succeeds, but it's a short-lived victory, and not satisfying. Rayette then turns up by taxi, and Robert winds up defending her against a party of phony intellectuals.
Five Easy Pieces' examination of class in American is strange and subtle, and informs everything that Robert does in the film.
Yet, while Sideways gives us a view of a man closing, successfully mind you, off a section of his life, the brief period of time we spend with Robert in Five Easy Pieces feels only like a snapshot of a fully lived life. And at the same time, the end launches him into an uncertain future. Like a true existentialist hero, Robert chooses neither the path of the past/patriarchy, nor the path of the false identity. He opts to shrug all identity and continue north ("Where we're going, it's gonna be cold as hell" says the truck driver giving him a lift), towards, we assume, the Alaska the two hitchhikers were seeking out, the life that's clean, a place to start again, a blank slate. That is, the impossible and the hellish.
If Sideways has anything on Five Easy Pieces its that its sense of sadness runs deeper and more hidden that Rafaelson's film, because so much is covered with comedy, including a hilarious sequence where Miles discovers his own agency and steals back his friend's wallet. Five Easy Pieces is raw, its comedy harsher, meaner, and a record of a time when Robert's anti-hero behavior was exactly what a great many Americans were seeking. Miles in Sideways is the person a great many American males are trying to avoid being.

December 08, 2005

Harold Pinter's Nobel Acceptance Speech

Battling numerous ailments and wheelchair-bound, playwright Harold Pinter still delivered a barnstorming critique of American Imperialism.

Art, truth and politics

I put to you that the United States is without doubt the greatest show on the road. Brutal, indifferent, scornful and ruthless it may be but it is also very clever. As a salesman it is out on its own and its most saleable commodity is self love. It's a winner. Listen to all American presidents on television say the words, 'the American people', as in the sentence, 'I say to the American people it is time to pray and to defend the rights of the American people and I ask the American people to trust their president in the action he is about to take on behalf of the American people.'

It's a scintillating stratagem. Language is actually employed to keep thought at bay. The words 'the American people' provide a truly voluptuous cushion of reassurance. You don't need to think. Just lie back on the cushion. The cushion may be suffocating your intelligence and your critical faculties but it's very comfortable. This does not apply of course to the 40 million people living below the poverty line and the 2 million men and women imprisoned in the vast gulag of prisons, which extends across the US.

Read the whole speech, it's brilliant.

December 07, 2005

Do you want room for cream in that union action?

starbuckslogo2.jpg
I had no idea, but this is the third Starbucks that is attempting to be unionized. Plus I really just wanted to include the cool graphic.

Workers at Third U.S. Starbucks Go Union

New York, NY - 25 Starbucks baristas and supporters wearing union pins and hats surrounded the store manager at the Union Square location in Manhattan tonight to announce their membership in the IWW Starbucks Workers Union (www.starbucksunion.org). The workers, joined by union baristas from two other New York Starbucks stores, demanded a guaranteed minimum of 30 hours of work per week and an end to Starbucks' unlawful anti-union campaign. The Union will assail Starbucks with a wide array of actions until the demands are met.

To me the odd thing is reading the ages of the workers--twenty-three, twenty-six...it just doesn't seem like the age to join a union. But maybe that's what years of demonization of unions have done to us.
By way of the cool new blog, The Consumerist.

December 06, 2005

Another Lonely Hitman

anotherlonelyhitman.jpg
Dir. Rokuro Mochizuki
1995
Rokuro Mochizuki's moody, downbeat Yakuza tale may mention "hitman" in the title, but apart from a backstory sequence Ryo Ishibashi's gangster doesn't even use a gun. Out of prison 10 years after whacking a family boss, Ishibashi's Tachibana tries to fit back into the lifestyle only to find it cynical and without honor. He doesn't get sent out on hits--instead he and a younger partner usually wind up kicking the hell out of junkies and pimps. You know, dull stuff. At the same time, he tries to rescue a prostitute, Yuki (Asami Sawaki) from the game and get her to kick heroin. Pretty soon, Tachibana wants out.

That's really all there is to Mochizuki's film, but the gloomy, autumnal air of Osaka, not the most photogenic of cities, puts Another Lonely Hitman on a level with some of the grim realism of 1970s American crime films (in an interview, Mochizuki mentions "French Connection II" as an influence. Ishibashi is a bit like Christopher Walken--mysterious delivery, open, far-off expression--though Asami Sawaki's Yuki is a bit grating as the girlfriend. However, she does balance the kawaii business with some harrowing Trainspotting-esque moments of debased junk-kicking.
Now that the Yakuza genre is being examined by the West (instead of staying isolated as a cheap genre that only Japanese 'get'), directors like Mochizuki and his antecedents may be worth studying. I've put his other available film, Onibi: The Fire Within on the Netflix Queue.
As for the DVD, this is a really crummy print, overly blue, and with a strange, thick black border around the whole frame, like it was shrunk by 80%. On the other hand, Tom Mes provides commentary and the DVD adds an interview with Rokuro Mochizuki, during which we understand that he is quite troubled by the popularity of Morning Musume.

The Perfect Shave

It all started with this article over at MSNBC.com, called How to Get That Perfect Shave. I can't remember what I was searching for originally, something about types of aftershave for sensitive skin. No matter.
When I first started shaving back when I was 15, I didn't know anything, and my dad had been using blue disposables and Barbasol for years. My total beardage was a thin whiff of a moustache. If I left it on, I looked like a tool. If I shaved it, I immediately broke out. Great options.
Years later I decided that perhaps electric shaving would be better, so I got one of those three-head whirly-blade things for Xmas, and for about a decade I used that. With sensitive skin, this was better, but still not effective, and there were always sections to go over again and again. Then I got the Gilette Mach3 (for a birthday gift, but used only much later) and after reading the article above, starting using that in conjunction with Aveda's shaving creme and Nivea aftershave balm for sensitive skin.
But I still felt I was missing out of the retro fun of a brush and a safety razor, and sent out a poll to my male friends. Unknown to me, 2/3 of them had already gone back (or had never left) to the traditional, old school method of shaving.
So finally, I invested a little chunk o' change and got me the goods.

There are essentially two main online stores I used: Classic Shaving and QEDUSA.

From Classic Shaving I bought the Merkur Hefty Classic from Germany (with some extra double-edge blades). This is your standard safety razor.
heftyclassic.jpg
I also got the Vulfix Badger Hair brush.
VF4007_849Ba.jpg
Those came last week. However I had to wait for the soap, which I had ordered at the same time. Yesterday, it arrived. I ordered it from QEDUSA, and I had chosen the Proraso soap from Italy. (If you've read the MSNBC article, you'll see that I simply just followed the recommendations and deferred to the cheapest of each category, while not skimping on quality.)
procup2.jpg
So finally, I got to have a shave with all the new goodies, and so I chose to do it last night, not leave it till the morning, when I'm in a rush, etc. However, we have the smallest waterheater in the world, so after taking a shower to get the body and face all hydrated and steamed, there isn't much left for filling a basin. So I've been using a mug full of boiling water from downstairs. This heats the brush and razor well, although I found with the all metal Merkur, and not the plastic handled Mach 3, too well. Yikes!

Anyway, I did a little bit of the brushy brushy soapy soapy and soon had a manly lather over my face. Whee! The Proraso contains Eucalyptus oil, and already my face felt like the inside of a peppermint patty. I followed the instructions and kept my shaving strokes nice and simple, straight down, not pushing on the skin, etc. Already, this was a close shave. And it sounded different from my usual shave, like I could actually hear the stubble a poppin'.

I re-lathered up and now shaved against the grain. Apart from a few nicks under my chin (always a problem area), I had no problems, and in fact had a shave that immediately rivaled the Mach 3 for closeness. All this with a single blade. Bloody hell. They've been keeping us in the dark all these years! Damn you, Gilette! Damn you, Norelco!

I rinsed with icy cold water, applied some aftershave, and for about 30 minutes afterwards, I felt my skin was made out of mint.

Conclusion: Classic shaving is the way to go. Your money outlay may be a lot at first: $60 for brush and razor, $10 for jar o' soap. And that's if you go cheap. But afterwards, you're just paying for blades and soap. And that ain't much.

Oh, and according to my friend Chris, who's been shaving this way for some time, the only decent blades from Germany, as they haven't decimated their steel industry.

AND: If you choose to do so, shaving supplies allow men to be as fetishistic over looking good as women. However, apart from The Art of Shaving chain store (which sells its own brand), there are very few physical outlets for men to check out classic shaving supplies. Some enterprising young businessperson needs to step up and fill the market.

Theater Review -- The Fourth Wall

fourthwall120605.jpg
From today's S.B. News-Press:

'Fourth Wall' is entertaining and troubling
By TED MILLS
NEWS-PRESS CORRESPONDENT

Following on the heels of Genesis West's production of Caryl Churchill's deconstructionist "Blue Heart" last month, Ensemble Theatre Company's presentation of A. R. Gurney's "The Fourth Wall" adds to the boundary-breaking this theater season.
The play's title alone suggests something meta-theatrical will be up. The invisible fourth wall that separates performer from audience -- can it really be torn down? And does this mean an evening of mortifying audience participation?
Thankfully not, but Mr. Gurney's play is an odd duck. Not too radical to upset the general public, it hints at subversion but hedges its bets in the second half. I can imagine many being entertained and pleased by Mr. Gurney's work, but I can't imagine many being deeply satisfied with it.
But there's lots to like. We open on a suburban living room, radiant in warm, rosy colors. Two characters enter: Roger (Robert Lesser), a "successful businessman," and Julia (Gillian Doyle), an old friend from New York. The dialogue is overwritten; the performances wooden.

Just as serious doubt begins to creep into our heads, the two regard the invisible fourth wall. We learn that Peggy (Nancy Nufer), Roger's wife, has removed all decoration from the wall and turned all furniture to face it. By doing so, this theatrical feng shui causes all who enter the room to engage in stagy dialogue, to act facing the "audience," and for behavior to devolve into a series of genre cliches. And one can only leave the room with a portentous line or bit of business.
It's a grand conceit, for it causes an end to our suspension of disbelief, a shift for which Bertolt Brecht would have applauded. We start to notice the position of the furniture, the odd positions of actors, the stagy, forced angles of the room, the fact that the liquor cabinet is stocked with water masquerading as gin and ginger ale as champagne. It's a Broadway meets Luis Bunuel's "The Exterminating Angel," with bourgeois characters stuck in a room of their own making.
Peggy enters to explain why she has turned the room this way: the Bush administration. The stolen election, the invasion of Iraq, the loss of freedoms: All this has left American life with an air of artificial reality. If we can't awaken from this play written by our leaders, why not take this feeling to its logical extreme?
The delightful frisson of Peggy's situation is that she's correct and incorrect at the same time. Like The Beatles sang, "And though she feels as if she's in a play/she is anyway." Yet our need to follow her story means we cannot consider her as such.
As Roger and Julie attempt to snap her out of it, their dialogue veers them instead toward both sex farce and musical comedy (the latter by way of a player piano that inspires its listener to launch into song).

To help Peggy, Roger calls on a young professor of theater studies, Floyd (Reed Armstrong), who also gets caught in the room's spell. Peggy desires to break past bourgeois theater genres and return to a leftist populism that sets out to reveal truth and speak it to power (essentially the era of great American theater from Odets to Miller). And Floyd loves that idea. But this is a postmodern play, right?
Floyd undermines all his positions just by stating them. Suggestions that Peggy's decisions could make a change in reality are negated by the fact that they come from the mouth of a character in a play. Floyd's role in the play proves correct the theory that the successful ideologies are those that can contain their own criticisms and still survive.
If the play sounds overly intellectual, it's not, or at least not in a way that stops the laughs from coming. The playwright, oddly enough, is A. R. Gurney, who most will know for his widely popular "Love Letters." Who knew that he could muster up the anti-Bush rhetoric?
On the other hand, why isn't there more anti-Bush rhetoric generally? And for that matter, can the American theater even survive as an art form if its most popular forms are the genres that "The Fourth Wall" sees as entrapment -- musicals and sex comedies?
Mr. Gurney's play asks these questions, but it doesn't offer any answers. The play remains stuck as an example of a defeatist cul-de-sac. Even as Peggy and Roger break through the fourth wall, nothing lies beyond, and we are acutely aware that for all of her character's desire, nothing will be achieved when the lights go up. Peggy will turn back into Nancy Nufer, the actor, and we the audience will wrap up warm and return home.

How the (Fake) News Is Made

BoingBoing posted a fascinating article (as opposed to linking to one) that traces the creation of a fake news story. The story of "Black Friday"--the big shopping weekend after Thanksgiving--was already written before the weekend was finished, and was not the work of journalists, but of a press release. How the press release is used without question as "fact" shows how crummy most of our journalism is these days.

Note that this story is built with two pieces of information: it has numbers and it offers an explanation for those numbers. It's really the perfect story, regardless of whether it's true or not. More importantly, the information attempts to provide an answer to a reasonable question: "How busy was Thanksgiving weekend for retailers?" and one can *not* leave the question unanswered. The possible answers are "up, down or flat." The answer "We don't really know" is not acceptable; it's not news. So the press release provides an answer that Thanksgiving Weekend sales were up significantly and an answer that the NRF people like. That answer is also believable because a national industry trade group had real data to back up its claim.

One might also want to point out that there is no real opposing trade group here to offer a counter-claim. Those who don't shop over the weekend aren't represented by anyone with a commercial interest in this question. Also, I should mention that the "big" story the day before Thanksgiving is how many people are traveling for the holidays, and how crowded the roads and airports are. That story doesn't seem to have any impact on the post-Thanksgiving story, which says everyone was shopping.

The NRF "news release" thus becomes news, variously massaged and distributed by news services. You might think of it as a kind of journalistic mash-up.

December 05, 2005

Grow Cube--Puzzle Game as Art

growcube.jpg
It's a simple idea really. Use logic to figure out the order of 10 disconnected objects. But game creator "ON" (that's his name, not his position) has made this puzzle a beautiful animated work of art. GrowCube is the sequel to the (harder) Grow, but the solution is very much worth it.
Thanks to Robot Action Boy for the link.

The Man Who Invented the Album Cover

For without Steinweiss, there would be no Abbey Road.

Big Town Songbook: Make 'em sing
Most people who have bought any musical recordings over the past 60 years might have assumed they always came in covers, or sleeves, or jackets, that featured a colorful graphic designed to enhance the lure of the music.
They didn't. Album covers had to be invented. This was a task that largely fell to a Brooklyn kid named Alex Steinweiss.

December 01, 2005

Just Say No to The Drugs!

drugfall.jpg
Photos from a "Moscow Wax Figure Exhibition Highlighting the Graphic Dangers of Drugs". Something wonderfully arty about this house of drugginess. Girl with dolly looks down with devilish disinterest. Mother too strung out to notice Twyla Tharp-ish statement by suicidal roommate in a sweater usually only worn by British TV weathermen in 1986. Stunning. As was that last sentence.
By way of The Cartoonist.